Roper, Jeremiah v. Allegis Group

2017 TN WC 181
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 26, 2017
Docket2016-01-0546
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 TN WC 181 (Roper, Jeremiah v. Allegis Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roper, Jeremiah v. Allegis Group, 2017 TN WC 181 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

FILED September 26~, 2017

TN COURT OF 1\' 0RKE.RS' C OhiPI.NSATION CLAniS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Jeremiah Roper, ) Docket No. 2016-01-0546 Employee, ) v. ) Allegis Group, ) State File No. 61298-2016 Employer, ) and ) Agri General Insurance Company, ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick Insurance Company. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This matter came before the Court on September 13, 2017, on Mr. Roper's Request for Expedited Hearing. The central legal issue is whether Allegis must provide Mr. Roper another panel of pain management specialists. The Court declines to order Allegis to provide Mr. Roper another panel but holds Mr. Roper is entitled to further treatment from the referring physician, Dr. Brian Tonne.

History of the Claim

Based upon the evidence from the December 13, 2016 and September 13, 2017 evidentiary hearings, the Court finds as follows: 1

Mr. Roper, an Allegis employee, sustained a traumatic, left-hand amputation when "something grabbed him" and started pulling his left arm into the auger bit. To save his life, he had to pull his arm free. After compressing the arteries to control his bleeding, Mr. Roper ran down two flights of stairs and forty yards across the auger deck. After a co-worker applied a tourniquet, a helicopter flew him to UT Medical Center for 1 The Court previously held an expedited hearing in this matter on December 13,2016. At the September 13 hearing, the Court tookjudicial notice of the testimony and exhibits admitted into evidence at the prior hearing. See Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453, 457 n.l (Tenn. 2012), holding, "we are permitted to take judicial notice ofthe facts from earlier proceedings in the same action." emergency treatment. To date, Mr. Roper has had nine surgeries on his left arm due to a sepsis infection. The surgeries resulted in amputations midway between his shoulder and elbow.

Although Mr. Roper is now infection-free, he testified he suffers daily pain since his injury. He described excruciating pain, an inability to sleep, and a complete change in his demeanor. Mr. Roper stated he isolates himself due to extreme social anxiety and lives alone in a camper trailer. He has recurring nightmares and angers easily. Further, since Mr. Roper was left-hand dominant, he had to learn how to do everything right- handed.

On April 5, 2017, Dr. Tonne, an orthopedic surgeon, referred Mr. Roper to pain management. Allegis provided a panel. However, since the selected physician was unavailable, Mr. Roper agreed to see another panel physician, Dr. Joe Browder. From April 5 until he saw Dr. Browder on June 14, Mr. Roper sent numerous emails to his attorney and the nurse case manager regarding the status of his appointment.

At his appointment, Dr. Browder noted Mr. Roper had "diffuse pain in the L shoulder with phantom pain that extends down the entire LUE 'like my arm is being drawn up and my fingers are bent back in the left hand."' Mr. Roper rated his pain as a ten out of ten. Under "Physical Examination," the record reflects, "[ e]xaggerated pain behaviors noted including wincing, guarding, self restricting [sic], and pulling away." However, Dr. Browder also documented that Mr. Roper "has severe sensitivity of the stump and upper arm/shoulder." He noted Mr. Roper's symptoms were consistent with complex regional pain syndrome but was unable to confirm the diagnosis due to the amputation.

Dr. Browder had several treatment recommendations. For Mr. Roper's severe sensitivity, he indicated treatment "may include psychological coaching, therapy, procedure and/or medication management." Due to Mr. Roper's "chronic residual neuropathic pain" and sleep issues, Dr. Browder suggested neuroadjuvant medications. Future treatment possibilities also included a left stellate ganglion block, a spinal cord stimulator, and desensitization therapy.

After performing the initial assessment, Dr. Browder referred Mr. Roper for an in- office risk evaluation and ordered a baseline urinary drug test (UDT) "prior to considering opiate therapy." Dr. Browder also recommended psychological treatment related to his pain. Immediately following the psychiatric referral, Dr. Browder noted that Mr. Roper reported '"occasional' THC use for his nerve pain; last smoke [sic] this past weekend." The UDT showed positive results for oxycodone, hydrocodone, marijuana, meth, and cocaine.

Dr. Browder refused to see Mr. Roper again due to the positive drug screen.

2 Allegis did not authorize Mr. Roper to select another physician from the panel, and Dr. Tonne instructed Mr. Roper not to return until his hypersensitivity and pain are under control for him to be able to use a prosthetic. Therefore, although Mr. Roper has a September 25 appointment with his psychologist, he is not currently receiving any other medical treatment.

During the hearing Mr. Rop r admitted to using illegal drugs since his injury and admitted using his workers' compensation checks to buy the other drugs.2 He stated that marijuana helps him psychologically and alleviates pain tremendously. He stated the only way he can get a full night's sleep is through self-medication because Allegis denied him timely medical treatment.

Mr. Roper argued he is entitled to see another physician who can help him manage his pain. He understands that any pain management physician will want to perform a drug test. Mr. Roper acknowledged he does not plan to stop using the illegal drugs prior to his first appointment with a physician. However, he stated he plans to adhere to the doctor's rules after the first appointment when he receives help from the physician.

Allegis argued Mr. Roper refused, by his own actions, to accept the medical treatment offered to him by using illegal drugs up until the time he saw Dr. Browder. It pointed out that Mr. Roper maintains he will continue to use illegal drugs until after his first visit with another pain management physician. Further, Allegis argued there is no medical proof that Dr. Tonne's April 5 referral for pain management is an ongoing referral.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

General Legal Principles

Mr. Roper bears the burden of proof on all essential elements of his workers' compensation claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 20 15). However, he is not required to prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. Rather, at an expedited hearing, Mr. Roper must come forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCordv. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Medical Benefits

2 Mr. Roper testified he had not smoked marijuana since he was in his teens or early twenties prior to the work injury. He also stated he never experimented with meth except for once after his injury.

3 The Workers' Compensation Law requires the employer to "furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment ... made reasonably necessary by accident[.]" When an injured employee expresses a need for medical treatment, the employer must provide a panel of "three (3) or more independent reputable physicians, surgeons, chiropractors or specialty practice groups" on a form "from which the injured employee shall select one (1) to be the treating physician." Tenn. Code Ann.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development Corporation
387 S.W.3d 453 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 TN WC 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roper-jeremiah-v-allegis-group-tennworkcompcl-2017.