Rooyakker & Sitz, Pllc v. Plante & Moran, Pllc
741 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 950
This text of 741 N.W.2d 333 (Rooyakker & Sitz, Pllc v. Plante & Moran, Pllc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rooyakker & Sitz, Pllc v. Plante & Moran, Pllc, 741 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 950 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
ROOYAKKER & SITZ, P.L.L.C., Mathew David Rooyakker, George Michael Sitz, and Sandra K. Burns, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PLANTE & MORAN, P.L.L.C., Kevin Lang, and Michelle Carrol, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
741 N.W.2d 333, 480 Mich. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rooyakker-sitz-pllc-v-plante-moran-pllc-mich-2007.