Rootes v. Holliday
4 Munf. 323, 18 Va. 323, 1814 Va. LEXIS 51
Opinion
In this case, the appeal was dismissed, (on motion of the appellees,) on the ground that the appeal bond, being executed by the surety only, without any principal obligor, was insufficient to authorize the appeal, which, therefore, was improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rootes v. Holliday, 4 Munf. 323, 18 Va. 323, 1814 Va. LEXIS 51 (Va. 1814).
4 Munf. 323 (Rootes v. Holliday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ayres v. Lewellin
3 Va. 609 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1832)
Miller v. Blannerhassett
5 Munf. 197 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1816)