Root v. Safford
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 65, 1847 N.Y. LEXIS 248
Opinion
Order referring it back to the master to re-examine the defendant C. L. Safford as to the several questions which are decided to be proper to be answered. Neither party to have costs against the other upon this application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Root v. Safford, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 65, 1847 N.Y. LEXIS 248 (N.Y. 1847).
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 65 (Root v. Safford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.