Root v. McGrew

Supreme Court of Kansas

Root v. McGrew

3 Kan. 215

DecidedFebruary 15, 1865

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Kan. 215 (Root v. McGrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Root v. McGrew, 3 Kan. 215 (kan 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Crozier, C. J.

This was a proceeding to reverse an order of the District Court of Wyandotte county, confirming a sale of certain property claimed by the plaintiff in error, as a homestead.

The questions presented were adjudicated by this court at the January term 1865, in the cases of Cusic v. Douglas et al., and Benz v. Rawlston, administrator of McCracken et al.

The order confirming the sale as to the property claimed as a homestead, will be reversed, and the sale thereof set aside.

All the justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Crozier, C. J.

This was a proceeding to reverse an order of the District Court of Wyandotte county, confirming a sale of certain property claimed by the plaintiff in error, as a homestead.

The questions presented were adjudicated by this court at the January term 1865, in the cases of Cusic v. Douglas et al., and Benz v. Rawlston, administrator of McCracken et al.

The order confirming the sale as to the property claimed as a homestead, will be reversed, and the sale thereof set aside.

All the justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Kan. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/root-v-mcgrew-kan-1865.