Root v. King

6 Cow. 569
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Cow. 569 (Root v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Root v. King, 6 Cow. 569 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

Savage, Ch. J.

Whatever course the parties may take in fixing on a judge’s charge, to be inserted in a ease, it is the right of the judge to see that it is correct. Neither the parties nor their counsel have a right, at their pleasure, to make out such a charge as will appear absurd or ridiculous. All they can require is, that the opinions expressed to the jury be substantially presented. But we think the judge erred in deciding that counsel should not be heard before him in relation to settling the ease ; and on this ground the motion must be granted.

Sutherland, J.

The charge is always subject to the correction of the judge, though the parties may agree upon it.

Woodworth, J.

The correction may be made at any time; and we would even stop an argument on the certificate of the circuit judge that his charge had been perverted. His charge need not be inserted in lime verba. The material parts alone are necessary. He should put into the case the substance of his opinion as expressed upon the law and the fact.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamee v. Huckabee
20 S.C. 190 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1883)
Zelinka v. Krauskopf
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 89 (New York Marine Court, 1877)
Fielden v. Lahens
14 Abb. Pr. 48 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cow. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/root-v-king-nysupct-1827.