Root v. Commonwealth

213 N.E.2d 474, 350 Mass. 764, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 850
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 N.E.2d 474 (Root v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Root v. Commonwealth, 213 N.E.2d 474, 350 Mass. 764, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 850 (Mass. 1966).

Opinion

This is a petition under G-. L. c. 79. The trial judge committed no abuse of discretion by admitting the opinion testimony of Mrs. Birdsall, daughter and manager of the affairs of the landowner at the time of the taking. Nichols, Eminent Domain (Rev. 3d) § 18.4 [2], p. 202. See Menici v. Orton Crane & Shovel Co. 285 Mass. 499, 503-505; Southwick v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authy. 339 Mass. 666, 668-669. Cf. Rubin v. Arlington, 327 Mass. 382, 383-385.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Assessors v. Smith
357 Mass. 778 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 N.E.2d 474, 350 Mass. 764, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/root-v-commonwealth-mass-1966.