Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C.

2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 13, 2026
DocketIndex No. 153723/2025
StatusUnpublished
AuthorMatthew V. Grieco

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U) (Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Root Ins. Co. v 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C. 2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U) March 13, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153723/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1537232025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/24/2026 3:45:44 PM] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MATfHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMP ANY, MOTION DATE cn/29/2026 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., ANGELA PLISCHTEJEW, BRS CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., BOROUGH MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC., HKP PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C., MR 2B, INC., NU HEALTH ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., RIDGEWOOD MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., ROCKAWAY PARK MEDICAL, P.C., STAR DECISION + ORDER ON MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, P.C., STEP UP PHYSICAL MOTION THERAPY P.C., VK CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., ALAGI CEESAY, EARWINS ,JOCELYN, SALUME CEESAY

Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 19, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 were read on this motion to/for .JUDGMENT- DEFAULT Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs

motion for a default judgment is granted in part.

On March 23, 2025, plaintiff, Root Insurance Company ("Root"), commenced

this action for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims

arising out of an alleged motor vehicle collision on August 2, 2024, on the following

grounds: (1) plaintiff maintains a founded belief that claimants' injuries did not arise

from an insured incident; and (2) two claimants failed to return subscribed copies of

their EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [summons and complaint]).

Specifically, plaintiff alleges that on ,July 19, 2024, it issued an automobile

insurance policy to non-party Mayco Petit. Defendants Alagi Abdoulie Ceesay, Earwins

,Jocelyn, and Salume Ceesay, supposed passengers in Petit's vehicle, filed claims arising

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 1 of 7 Motion No. 001

1 of 7 [* 1] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

from an alleged motor vehicle collision on August 2, 2024. Root investigated the claims

and conducted EUOs for Petit and all three claimants. Alagi and Salume Ceesay failed to

return subscribed EUO transcripts (id.; see also NYSCEF Doc. No. 20 [affirmation in

support of default motion]).

On October 23, 2025, plaintiff moved for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR

3215 (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 18-36) against all defendants.

Defendants 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C. ("3 rd Ave), BRS Chiropractic, P.C. ("BRS"),

and Ridgewood Medical Services, P.C. ("Ridgewood") filed an answer with counter-

claims on December 22, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 37). Plaintiff filed a notice of rejection

on ,January 2, 2026 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 38).

A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must

move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of

the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the

claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[fJ; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480, 481 [1st

Dept 2023]).

To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate

"enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists"

(Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by

affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at

70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some

firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531,535 [1 st Dept 1987]).

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 2 of 7 Motion No. 001

2 of 7 [* 2] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

The failure to subscribe and return an EUO transcript is a violation of a condition

precedent warranting denial of coverage (see Kemper lndep. Ins. Co. v Cornerstone

Chiropractic, P.C., 185 AD3d 468 [1st Dept 2020]).

In addition, a court may properly find that an insurer has no duty to pay no-fault

claims if the insurer demonstrates a "founded belief that the alleged injury [did] not

arise out of an insured incident" (Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Grp. of Ins. Cos., 90

NY2d 195, 199, [1997]).

Here, plaintiff has submitted, inter alia: the summons and verified complaint

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 1); affidavits of service and additional service in compliance with

CPLR 3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 24, 31, 34); no-fault claims forms (NYSCEF Doc.

No. 25); EUO subscription letters for Alagi and Salume Ceesay (NYSCEF Doc. No. 30);

EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 26-29); an affirmation of Colby King, a claims

manager employed by Root, as to indications that the loss might not have been a

covered event (see infra) (NYSCEF Doc. No. 22); an affirmation of an attorney, Ivana

Bologna, attesting to Alagi and Salume Ceesay's failure to return subscribed copies of

their EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. No. 21); and an affirmation of counsel in support

of the motion (NYSCEF Doc. No. 20).

Regarding service, plaintiff has established proper service through the affidavits

of service and additional service required by CPLR 3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 24,

31, 34).

As to the facts constituting the claim, plaintiff has established that Alagi and

Salume Ceesay failed to subscribe and return copies of their EUO transcripts, despite

due demand, constituting violations of conditions precedent, and warranting denial of

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 3 of 7 Motion No. 001

3 of 7 [* 3] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

coverage as to all claims pertaining to Alagi and Salume Ceesay, only (see Kemper, 185

AD3d at 468).

However, plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated a "founded belief that the

alleged injury [did] not arise out of an insured incident" (Central Gen. Hosp., 90 NY2d

at 199). The affirmation of Colby King, a claims manager employed by Root (NYSCEF

Doc. No. 22), indicates: the policy was issued 13 days prior to the claimed accident; the

insured vehicle is 15 years old; the policy was procured using a Florida address, but the

collision occurred in N cw York; after multiple requests for valid proof of residency, Petit

was unable to produce any valid proof of residency in Florida; Petit stated during his

EUO that he had procured the policy after his arrival in New York (around April or May

2024) and has not returned to Florida since; Petit gave a current address in Queens,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central General Hospital v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
681 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.
790 N.E.2d 1156 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v. Cornerstone Chiropractic, P.C.
2020 NY Slip Op 3876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Joosten v. Gale
129 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/root-ins-co-v-3rd-ave-chiropractic-pc-nysupctnewyork-2026.