Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C.

2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U)
New York Supreme Court, New York County·Decided March 13, 2026·No. Index No. 153723/2025·Unpublished·Matthew V. Grieco

Opinion

Root Ins. Co. v 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C.

2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U)

March 13, 2026

Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153723/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1537232025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/24/2026 3:45:44 PM]

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. MATfHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMP ANY,

MOTION DATE cn/29/2026 Plaintiff,

MOTION SEQ.

NO. 001 -v-

3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., ANGELA PLISCHTEJEW, BRS CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., BOROUGH MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC., HKP PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C., MR 2B, INC., NU HEALTH ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., RIDGEWOOD MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., ROCKAWAY PARK MEDICAL, P.C., STAR DECISION + ORDER ON MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, P.C., STEP UP PHYSICAL MOTION THERAPY P.C., VK CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., ALAGI CEESAY, EARWINS ,JOCELYN, SALUME CEESAY

Defendant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 19, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 were read on this motion to/for .JUDGMENT- DEFAULT Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs

motion for a default judgment is granted in part.

On March 23, 2025, plaintiff, Root Insurance Company ("Root"), commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims arising out of an alleged motor vehicle collision on August 2, 2024, on the following grounds: (1) plaintiff maintains a founded belief that claimants' injuries did not arise from an insured incident; and (2) two claimants failed to return subscribed copies of their EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [summons and complaint]).

Specifically, plaintiff alleges that on ,July 19, 2024, it issued an automobile insurance policy to non-party Mayco Petit. Defendants Alagi Abdoulie Ceesay, Earwins ,Jocelyn, and Salume Ceesay, supposed passengers in Petit's vehicle, filed claims arising

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 1 of 7 Motion No. 001

1 of 7

[* 1]

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

from an alleged motor vehicle collision on August 2, 2024. Root investigated the claims and conducted EUOs for Petit and all three claimants. Alagi and Salume Ceesay failed to return subscribed EUO transcripts (id.; see also NYSCEF Doc. No. 20 [affirmation in support of default motion]).

On October 23, 2025, plaintiff moved for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 18-36) against all defendants.

Defendants 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C. ("3 rd Ave), BRS Chiropractic, P.C. ("BRS"), and Ridgewood Medical Services, P.C. ("Ridgewood") filed an answer with counter- claims on December 22, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 37). Plaintiff filed a notice of rejection on ,January 2, 2026 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 38).

A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[fJ; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480, 481 [1st Dept 2023]).

To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate "enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists" (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at 70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531,535 [1 st Dept 1987]).

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 2 of 7 Motion No. 001

2 of 7

[* 2]

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

The failure to subscribe and return an EUO transcript is a violation of a condition precedent warranting denial of coverage (see Kemper lndep. Ins. Co. v Cornerstone Chiropractic, P.C., 185 AD3d 468 [1st Dept 2020]).

In addition, a court may properly find that an insurer has no duty to pay no-fault claims if the insurer demonstrates a "founded belief that the alleged injury [did] not arise out of an insured incident" (Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Grp. of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195, 199, [1997]).

Here, plaintiff has submitted, inter alia: the summons and verified complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1); affidavits of service and additional service in compliance with CPLR 3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 24, 31, 34); no-fault claims forms (NYSCEF Doc. No. 25); EUO subscription letters for Alagi and Salume Ceesay (NYSCEF Doc. No. 30); EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 26-29); an affirmation of Colby King, a claims manager employed by Root, as to indications that the loss might not have been a covered event (see infra) (NYSCEF Doc. No. 22); an affirmation of an attorney, Ivana Bologna, attesting to Alagi and Salume Ceesay's failure to return subscribed copies of their EUO transcripts (NYSCEF Doc. No. 21); and an affirmation of counsel in support of the motion (NYSCEF Doc. No. 20).

Regarding service, plaintiff has established proper service through the affidavits of service and additional service required by CPLR 3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 24, 31, 34).

As to the facts constituting the claim, plaintiff has established that Alagi and Salume Ceesay failed to subscribe and return copies of their EUO transcripts, despite due demand, constituting violations of conditions precedent, and warranting denial of

153723/2025 ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY vs. 3RD AVE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. ET AL Page 3 of 7 Motion No. 001

3 of 7

[* 3]

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/16/2026 12:57 P~ INDEX NO. 153723/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026

coverage as to all claims pertaining to Alagi and Salume Ceesay, only (see Kemper, 185 AD3d at 468).

However, plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated a "founded belief that the alleged injury [did] not arise out of an insured incident" (Central Gen. Hosp., 90 NY2d at 199). The affirmation of Colby King, a claims manager employed by Root (NYSCEF Doc. No. 22), indicates: the policy was issued 13 days prior to the claimed accident; the insured vehicle is 15 years old; the policy was procured using a Florida address, but the collision occurred in N cw York; after multiple requests for valid proof of residency, Petit was unable to produce any valid proof of residency in Florida; Petit stated during his EUO that he had procured the policy after his arrival in New York (around April or May 2024) and has not returned to Florida since; Petit gave a current address in Queens, New York; there is no police report or MV-104 report for the alleged accident (and the alleged adverse vehicle allegedly fled the scene); and there were inconsistencies in the testimony of Petit, ,Jocelyn, and Alagi and Salume Ccesay regarding events on the day of the collision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

2026 NY Slip Op 30985(U) (Root Ins. Co. v. 3rd Ave Chiropractic, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central General Hospital v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
681 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.
790 N.E.2d 1156 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v. Cornerstone Chiropractic, P.C.
2020 NY Slip Op 3876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Joosten v. Gale
129 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)