Roosevelt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roosevelt v. State

824 So. 2d 332, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 2002 WL 1972372

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 28, 2002

DocketNo. 3D02-1915

StatusPublished

This text of 824 So. 2d 332 (Roosevelt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roosevelt v. State, 824 So. 2d 332, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 2002 WL 1972372 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alton Roosevelt appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court granted relief on point one. As to point two, we treat this part of the motion as being made under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The facts set forth by the defendant do not demonstrate a basis for relief under Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). As to point three, relief was correctly denied [333]*333under Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Alton Roosevelt appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court granted relief on point one. As to point two, we treat this part of the motion as being made under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The facts set forth by the defendant do not demonstrate a basis for relief under Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). As to point three, relief was correctly denied [333]*333under Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1997).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

824 So. 2d 332, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 2002 WL 1972372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roosevelt-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack