Roosevelt v. Crommelin

New York Supreme Court

Roosevelt v. Crommelin

18 Johns. 253

DecidedAugust 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Johns. 253 (Roosevelt v. Crommelin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roosevelt v. Crommelin, 18 Johns. 253 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion, in this case, is not grounded on any irregularity in the proceedings ; and we shall not, therefore, relieve, except on terms. The defendant, if he wishes to reverse the proceedings, on the facts stated, must resort to a writ of error. But, without giving, any opinion on the case as stated in the affidavits, we must deny [257]*257the motion, unless the defendant puts in good special on a writ to be issued in a new action. bail,

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion, in this case, is not grounded on any irregularity in the proceedings ; and we shall not, therefore, relieve, except on terms. The defendant, if he wishes to reverse the proceedings, on the facts stated, must resort to a writ of error. But, without giving, any opinion on the case as stated in the affidavits, we must deny [257]*257the motion, unless the defendant puts in good special on a writ to be issued in a new action. bail,

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Johns. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roosevelt-v-crommelin-nysupct-1820.