Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter

742 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 552775, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2014·No. 11-56846·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained.

Judge O’Scannlain’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently with this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter, 742 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 552775, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682 (9th Cir. 2014).

742 F.3d 917 (Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Arizona v. Martin Raul Soto-Fong
474 P.3d 34 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2020)
McCullough v. State
168 A.3d 1045 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2017)
State v. Nathan
522 S.W.3d 881 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2017)
Dharminder Vir Sen v. State
2017 WY 30 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2017)
State v. Laird
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016
Brian Starks v. Joe Easterling
659 F. App'x 277 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
Vasquez v. Commonwealth
781 S.E.2d 920 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2016)
New Jersey v. Zuber
126 A.3d 335 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
State of New Jersey v. Ricky Zuber
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015