Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter

Ninth Circuit

Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter

742 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 552775, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 12, 2014

Docket11-56846

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 742 F.3d 917 (Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter, 742 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 552775, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained.

Judge O’Scannlain’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently with this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI