Roosevelt James v. Louie L. Wainwright

680 F.2d 102, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17706
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 6, 1982·No. 81-6017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a Florida habeas case by a prisoner convicted of second degree murder. Denial of the writ is AFFIRMED.

Primary evidence against petitioner in his jury trial was a transcript, read to the jury by the court reporter, of an eyewitness’ testimony given nine months earlier at a preliminary hearing. The witness was sworn before testifying at the preliminary hearing and was subjected to cross-examination by petitioner’s attorney. The witness died after the preliminary hearing and before the trial. Use of this testimony under these circumstances was constitutionally permissible. Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980); California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970); Mattox v. U. S., 156 U.S. 237, 15 S.Ct. 337, 39 L.Ed.2d 409 (1895).

When the transcript of the eyewitness’ testimony was introduced the court instructed that the jury was to consider the testimony the same as though the witness were testifying before them in court. Defense counsel objected, and the judge then stated that he only meant to emphasize that *103 the deceased witness had been testifying under oath at the preliminary hearing. As explained by the court, the instruction was not erroneous.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roosevelt James v. Louie L. Wainwright, 680 F.2d 102, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17706 (11th Cir. 1982).

680 F.2d 102 (Roosevelt James v. Louie L. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mattox v. United States
156 U.S. 237 (Supreme Court, 1895)
California v. Green
399 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Ohio v. Roberts
448 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1980)