Roosevelt Isaac v. P. Douglas Taylor Nathaniel Watson Joe Black

74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38848, 1996 WL 26733
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1996
Docket95-7382
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1232 (Roosevelt Isaac v. P. Douglas Taylor Nathaniel Watson Joe Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roosevelt Isaac v. P. Douglas Taylor Nathaniel Watson Joe Black, 74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38848, 1996 WL 26733 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roosevelt ISAAC, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
P. Douglas TAYLOR; Nathaniel Watson; Joe Black,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996
Decided: January 24, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-2003-3-19-BC)

Robert Isaac, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Isaac v. Taylor, No. CA-94-2003-3-19-BC (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38848, 1996 WL 26733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roosevelt-isaac-v-p-douglas-taylor-nathaniel-watso-ca4-1996.