Roosevelt Hospital v. New York El. R. R.
46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961
Opinion
Upon an examination of the questions raised upon this appeal, we do not see any that have not been disposed of by this court adversely to the appellants.
The case of Peyton v. The New York El. R. R. Co., 63 Hun, 536; 42 St. Rep., 843, relied upon by the counsel for the appellant, is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
O’Brien and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roosevelt Hospital v. New York El. R. R., 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
46 N.Y. St. Rep. 961 (Roosevelt Hospital v. New York El. R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. Colville
18 N.Y.S. 509 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)