Roosevelt Carroll, Jr. v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
This text of Roosevelt Carroll, Jr. v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Roosevelt Carroll, Jr. v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-2535 _____________________________
ROOSEVELT CARROLL, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
February 27, 2019
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REQUEST FOR A WRITTEN OPINION
PER CURIAM.
We deny Petitioner’s motion for rehearing, grant his request for a written opinion, and withdraw our opinion issued on December 12, 2018, and substitute the following opinion in its place:
DISMISSED. See Dickerson v. State, 204 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Brown v. State, 197 So. 3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Roosevelt Carroll, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.
Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections; Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roosevelt Carroll, Jr. v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roosevelt-carroll-jr-v-mark-s-inch-secretary-florida-department-of-fladistctapp-2019.