Roose v. Mascot Copper Co.
This text of 212 A.D. 801 (Roose v. Mascot Copper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order is improper in form, in that the issues concerning which the examination is sought are not specifically stated therein. (See Bamberger v. Cooke, 181 App. Div. 805.) The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to renew the motion at Special Term upon payment of said costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, Martin and Burr, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew the motion at Special Term upon payment of said costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roose-v-mascot-copper-co-nyappdiv-1925.