Roose v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roose v. Hamilton

249 A.D. 852, 294 N.Y.S. 341, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 852 (Roose v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roose v. Hamilton, 249 A.D. 852, 294 N.Y.S. 341, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by reducing the amount of damages by the sum of six dollars and eighty cents additional allowances, with interest, improperly allowed under the Tax Law, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Settle order on notice. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ. [161 Misc. 800.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by reducing the amount of damages by the sum of six dollars and eighty cents additional allowances, with interest, improperly allowed under the Tax Law, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Settle order on notice. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ. [161 Misc. 800.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 852, 294 N.Y.S. 341, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roose-v-hamilton-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack