Roose v. Hamilton
13 N.E.2d 58, 276 N.Y. 678, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1255
This text of 13 N.E.2d 58 (Roose v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roose v. Hamilton, 13 N.E.2d 58, 276 N.Y. 678, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1255 (N.Y. 1938).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 2004
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 N.E.2d 58, 276 N.Y. 678, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roose-v-hamilton-ny-1938.