Roos v. Treubig
125 N.Y.S. 782
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The testimony given upon the examination of the judgment debtor is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a fine of more than $250, that being the maximum fine which can be imposed as a punishment for contempt where no actual loss or injury is shown. Ross v. La. Cagnina, 124 N. Y. Supp. 753.
The order appealed from is modified, by reducing the fine imposed to the sum of $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roos v. Treubig, 125 N.Y.S. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
125 N.Y.S. 782 (Roos v. Treubig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eigenmacht v. Herter
74 Misc. 405 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)