Roos v. Treubig

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Roos v. Treubig

125 N.Y.S. 782

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 N.Y.S. 782 (Roos v. Treubig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roos v. Treubig, 125 N.Y.S. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The testimony given upon the examination of the judgment debtor is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a fine of more than $250, that being the maximum fine which can be imposed as a punishment for contempt where no actual loss or injury is shown. Ross v. La. Cagnina, 124 N. Y. Supp. 753.

The order appealed from is modified, by reducing the fine imposed to the sum of $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The testimony given upon the examination of the judgment debtor is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a fine of more than $250, that being the maximum fine which can be imposed as a punishment for contempt where no actual loss or injury is shown. Ross v. La. Cagnina, 124 N. Y. Supp. 753.

The order appealed from is modified, by reducing the fine imposed to the sum of $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 N.Y.S. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roos-v-treubig-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack