Roope Co. v. Ponca Twp.

1919 OK 332, 185 P. 327, 76 Okla. 296, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 191
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 18, 1919·No. No. 10737·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The question presented is whether township government in Lincoln county was abolished by the provisions of chap. 171, Sess. Laws 1919.

Township officers were abolished in this state under the provisions of chap. 286, Sess. Laws 1915, except in those counties mentioned in section 7 of the act; Lincoln county not being one of the exceptions. But it appears the voters of Lincoln county, at the general election held in 1916, re-established township government under the provisions of section 5-A, art. 5, of the Constitution. (P. 120, Sess. Laws 1916).

Chapter 171, Sess. Laws 1919, does no more than to amend section 7 of chap. 286, Sess. Laws 1915, by striking out the names of certain counties among those exempted from the provisions of the 1915 act. Therefore the 1915 act had no reference or application to township government re-established in Lincoln county.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PITCHFORD, McNEILL, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roope Co. v. Ponca Twp., 1919 OK 332, 185 P. 327, 76 Okla. 296, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 191 (Okla. 1919).

1919 OK 332 (Roope Co. v. Ponca Twp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First State Bank of Oilton v. O'Bannon
1927 OK 403 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Carr v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
1926 OK 515 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Ashinger v. Local Union No. 276, U. B. C. & J. of A.
197 P. 437 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Samuel Dodsworth Book Co. v. Fulcher
1920 OK 356 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)