Rooney v. Richers

30 S.E. 262, 103 Ga. 576, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 1, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 262 (Rooney v. Richers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rooney v. Richers, 30 S.E. 262, 103 Ga. 576, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 184 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Fish, J.

Where under a statute in force at the time an action was brought in a city court, to the November term thereof, the second term was the trial term of the case, and, pending the action, the time for the sitting of the second term was by law changed from the first Monday in February to the first Monday in January, a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor at the January term will not be set aside as having been prematurely rendered, when it appears that the case was in default and the motion to set aside does not disclose the existence of any meritorious defense, or set forth any facts showing that the defendant was in any manner injured, or that he lost any right, by reason of the fact that the judgment was rendered at the January term. The more especially is this so when it appears that there had been personal service, and that the act changing the terms of the court allowed final judgments to be entered at the first term in undefended cases wherein there had been such service.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purity Ice Works v. Rountree
30 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E. 262, 103 Ga. 576, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rooney-v-richers-ga-1898.