Rooney v. Hurlbut

98 P. 765, 79 Kan. 231, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 214
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided December 12, 1908·No. No. 15,684·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

A will, duly signed and acknowledged, and in the language set forth below, omitting the formal parts, conveys to the husband a life-estate of the interest of the testatrix in the land described therein, and the remainder to her brother, Daniel Hurlbut, such being the clear intention of the entire instrument. The will reads as follows:

“I give and bequeath to my beloved husband all of my interest to and in the farm on which we now reside, being the south half of the north E. quarter of sec. 34, [232]*232town. 2, of range 15, and all the personal which I may at my death own on said premises. If my said husband should not survive me then I devise and bequeath all of said property to my brother Daniel Hurlbut and his heirs forever.
“It is my will that if my said husband should survive me, that he have and hold said property during his life-time and at his death I devise and.bequeath said-property to the said Daniel Hurlbut, my brother.”

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rooney v. Hurlbut, 98 P. 765, 79 Kan. 231, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 214 (kan 1908).

98 P. 765 (Rooney v. Hurlbut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kistler v. Fitzpatrick Mortgage Co.
71 P.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Hawkins v. Hansen
142 P. 280 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)