Rooney v. Farrell

87 N.W. 338, 62 Neb. 611, 1901 Neb. LEXIS 247
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 1901
DocketNo. 9,454
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 N.W. 338 (Rooney v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rooney v. Farrell, 87 N.W. 338, 62 Neb. 611, 1901 Neb. LEXIS 247 (Neb. 1901).

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

There is attached to this transcript the certificate of the clerk of the district court stating “that the foregoing [612]*612is a true and perfect transcript of the petition, answer, reply, instructions given and excepted to in said action, the verdict, motion for a new trial and motion to retax costs in said action, together with the appeal bond, as the same are on file and of record in my office.” The transcript is not otherwise authenticated. It will be observed that the certificate of the clerk of the trial court makes no mention of, or in any manner authenticates, the final judgment in the cause. It follows that this court is without jurisdiction. Littell v. Cross, 58 Nebr., 594; Melcher v. Haley, 58 Nebr., 729. The petition in error is

Dismissed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anania v. City of Omaha
102 N.W.2d 49 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 N.W. 338, 62 Neb. 611, 1901 Neb. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rooney-v-farrell-neb-1901.