Rooney v. City of Everett
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing appellant’s action against respondent city of Everett to recover back pay for work as assistant street painter. The court, upon this appeal, did not have the benefit of oral argument by either party.
By budget and salary ordinance for the period in question, no provision was made for the position. Appellant, who was formerly the assistant street painter, has continued to do the same work as a day laborer.
The legislative action of a city in abolishing a position is not subject to judicial review in the absence of a showing of bad faith. State ex rel. Morris v. Seattle, 5 Wn. (2d) 267, 104 P. (2d) 118.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
367 P.2d 149 (Rooney v. City of Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.