Rooney v. Barnett Banks, Inc.

555 So. 2d 884, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7326, 1989 WL 155646
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1989·No. No. 89-1501·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. We believe the trial court erred in holding that the appellants have not sufficiently alleged an actual and apparent agency relationship between the appellee and a local banking institution. See Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla.1983); and Ft. Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insur. Co., 411 So.2d 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), rev. denied 418 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1982). Our holding is, of course, limited to the issues addressed by the trial court, that of the sufficiency of the allegations of agency, and is not intended as a comment of any kind on the underlying cause of action against the appellee and its alleged agent.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rooney v. Barnett Banks, Inc., 555 So. 2d 884, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7326, 1989 WL 155646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

555 So. 2d 884 (Rooney v. Barnett Banks, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ilgen v. Henderson Properties, Inc.
683 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)