Rooney v. Auto Affairs International, Inc.
782 S.W.2d 139, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs after a trial de novo in the circuit court. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rooney v. Auto Affairs International, Inc., 782 S.W.2d 139, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
782 S.W.2d 139 (Rooney v. Auto Affairs International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.