Rooks v. State

102 So. 3d 666, 2012 WL 130629, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 2012·No. No. 2D11-3510·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), review dismissed, 29 So.3d 291 (Fla.2010); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Clayton v. State, 904 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sampson v. State, 832 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

SILBERMAN, C.J., and WHATLEY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rooks v. State, 102 So. 3d 666, 2012 WL 130629, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

102 So. 3d 666 (Rooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ives v. State
993 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Middleton v. State
721 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Wright v. State
834 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Sampson v. State
832 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Clayton v. State
904 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Brown v. State
827 So. 2d 1054 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bizzell v. State
912 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
MacAluso v. State
912 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ward v. State
946 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)