Rooks v. New Prime, Inc.

441 S.W.3d 153, 2014 WL 2590087, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 654
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 2014·No. No. ED 100626·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Glenda Rooks (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that dismissed Claimant’s application for review pursuant to Section 288.200, RSMo, because it was untimely. Claimant had been requesting review of the Appeals Tribunal’s decision denying her unemployment benefits because Claimant voluntarily separated from work without good cause attributable to the work or the employer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rooks v. New Prime, Inc., 441 S.W.3d 153, 2014 WL 2590087, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 654 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

441 S.W.3d 153 (Rooks v. New Prime, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.