Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.

375 F.2d 1012
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 11, 1966
Docket14060_1
StatusPublished

This text of 375 F.2d 1012 (Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., 375 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

ORDER.

This cause having come on to be heard upon a pleading of the above named plaintiff entitled “Motion To Be Relieved Of Final Judgment,” the brief in support thereof, and the brief of defendant in opposition thereto, and upon due consideration,

It is ordered that said motion may be, and it is, hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 F.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roofire-alarm-company-v-underwriters-laboratories-inc-ca6-1966.