Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.

284 F.2d 360
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1960
Docket14060
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 F.2d 360 (Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., 284 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

ORDER.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the trial court, sustaining the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of District Judge Darr, adequately expressed, the order of the United States District Court is affirmed. 188 F.Supp. 753.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of American Society for Testing & Materials
231 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 F.2d 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roofire-alarm-company-v-underwriters-laboratories-inc-ca6-1960.