Roof v. Bogdanski

152 A.D.2d 955, 544 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9843

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from that portion of an order which denied his motion for a protective order and granted plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery in accordance with their notice and supplemental notice for discovery and inspection. We conclude that the court properly denied a protective order. CPLR 3122 provides that a motion for a protective order must be made within 10 days of service of the challenged discovery notice. Defendant failed to make a timely motion and thus waived any objection to the propriety of the discovery demand. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — discovery.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roof v. Bogdanski, 152 A.D.2d 955, 544 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 955 (Roof v. Bogdanski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.