ROODSON FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA

Court of Appeals of Georgia

ROODSON FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA

DecidedJanuary 29, 2026

DocketA24A0316

StatusPublished

This text of ROODSON FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA (ROODSON FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ROODSON FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA, (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

January 29, 2026

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A24A0316. FLEUREME v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al.

HODGES, Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the

Supreme Court in Fleureme v. City of Atlanta, 322 Ga. 180 (917 SE2d 593) (2025), our

decision in Fleureme v. City of Atlanta, 371 Ga. App. 416 (900 SE2d 625) (2024), is

hereby vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this

Court. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order to the extent that it granted the

City’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff’s ante litem notice delivered

to the “Office of the Mayor” failed to satisfy the notice required by OCGA § 36-33-

5(f).

Judgment reversed. Doyle, P. J., and Watkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI