Rood v. Rood

273 N.W. 337, 280 Mich. 33, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 593
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 1937·No. Docket No. 164, Calendar No. 39,354.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

September 26, 1934, plaintiff was granted a decree of divorce against defendant upon the ground of extreme cruelty and nonsupport. After this decree was rendered, defendant remarried. At the time the decree was awarded, plaintiff had been afflicted with tuberculosis. This condition has recurred and plaintiff has been treated in Trudeau sanatorium and has been advised she ought to go to Tucson, Arizona. She made application for an increase in alimony. Defendant filed a cross-petition asking for reduction in alimony. The trial *Page 34 court increased the award of alimony from $75 a month to $100 a month.

We see no reason for changing the award, which is hereby affirmed, with costs.

FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, WIEST, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, SHARPE, and CHANDLER, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rood v. Rood, 273 N.W. 337, 280 Mich. 33, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 593 (Mich. 1937).

273 N.W. 337 (Rood v. Rood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yanz v. Yanz
323 N.W.2d 489 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
Boyer v. Boyer
186 N.W.2d 842 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Lamb v. Lamb
83 N.W.2d 323 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1957)
Ford v. Ford
46 N.W.2d 452 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1951)