Rood v. National Spraker Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rood v. National Spraker Bank

257 A.D. 1020, 12 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8928

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1020 (Rood v. National Spraker Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rood v. National Spraker Bank, 257 A.D. 1020, 12 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the Montgomery Trial Term dismissing his complaint. The action was brought to recover from defendants the sum of $1,375. Plaintiff alleged that he deposited with the National Spraker Bank of Canajoharie, N. Y., between March 10, 1919, and February 19, 1920, the sum of $1,680, and that he made withdrawals therefrom between March 18, 1919, and January 29, 1920, amounting to the sum of $305. He testified that he made no further withdrawals. The answer admitted the deposit of the moneys but alleged that the entire amount had been withdrawn. The trial court found that it had been withdrawn. The evidence sustains the finding. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the Montgomery Trial Term dismissing his complaint. The action was brought to recover from defendants the sum of $1,375. Plaintiff alleged that he deposited with the National Spraker Bank of Canajoharie, N. Y., between March 10, 1919, and February 19, 1920, the sum of $1,680, and that he made withdrawals therefrom between March 18, 1919, and January 29, 1920, amounting to the sum of $305. He testified that he made no further withdrawals. The answer admitted the deposit of the moneys but alleged that the entire amount had been withdrawn. The trial court found that it had been withdrawn. The evidence sustains the finding. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1020, 12 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rood-v-national-spraker-bank-nyappdiv-1939.