Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Gibson Lighter Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Gibson Lighter Mfg. Co.

7 A.D.2d 897, 181 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 897 (Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Gibson Lighter Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Gibson Lighter Mfg. Co., 7 A.D.2d 897, 181 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion to cancel and discharge undertaking unanimously reversed on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. While the origin of the first undertaking may have been in the application for a brief stay, the undertakings in sequence have nevertheless been to secure any money judgment which might be entered in favor of the plaintiff. Until it is finally resolved whether plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment, the undertaking has a function to perform. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion to cancel and discharge undertaking unanimously reversed on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. While the origin of the first undertaking may have been in the application for a brief stay, the undertakings in sequence have nevertheless been to secure any money judgment which might be entered in favor of the plaintiff. Until it is finally resolved whether plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment, the undertaking has a function to perform. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 897, 181 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronson-art-metal-works-inc-v-gibson-lighter-mfg-co-nyappdiv-1959.