Ronollo v. Jacobs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ronollo v. Jacobs

895 S.W.2d 136, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 1995 WL 34232

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 1995·No. No. 65820·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jacobs appeals the trial court’s grant of Virginia Ronollo’s Motion to Dismiss his counterclaims which were for suit on a promissory note, fraud and breach of contract.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jacobs appeals the trial court’s grant of Virginia Ronollo’s Motion to Dismiss his counterclaims which were for suit on a promissory note, fraud and breach of contract.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Ronollo v. Jacobs, 895 S.W.2d 136, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 1995 WL 34232 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 136 (Ronollo v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.