Ronnyeh R. v. Gwendolyn M.
This text of 99 A.D.3d 717 (Ronnyeh R. v. Gwendolyn M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Family Court properly dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action. Assuming the truth of the allegations in the petition, and according the petitioner the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the facts alleged do not fit into any of the grounds for vacatur of an acknowledgment of paternity more than 60 days after it was executed, i.e, fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact (see Family Ct Act § 516-a [b] [ii]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.D.3d 717, 951 N.Y.2d 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronnyeh-r-v-gwendolyn-m-nyappdiv-2012.