Ronny Gene Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 2013·No. 03-13-00680-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00680-CR

Ronny Gene Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 426TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 67764-A, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. FEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ronny Gene Smith has filed a pro se notice of appeal of the trial court’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law entered in response to his application for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. art. 11.07 (procedure for application for writ of habeas corpus).

Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony

convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 5;

Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481,

483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig.

proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no role in criminal law matters pertaining to

proceedings initiated under article 11.07. See In re Briscoe, 20 S.W.3d 196 (Tex. App.—Houston

[14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); cf. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115,

117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.1

__________________________________________ J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 6, 2013

Do Not Publish

1 We also note that the trial court certification in the record reflects that appellant has no right of appeal. We are required to dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronny Gene Smith v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ronny Gene Smith v. State (Ronny Gene Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
in Re Johanson Lee Watson, Relator
253 S.W.3d 319 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)