Ronniger v. Birnbaum

California Court of Appeal

Ronniger v. Birnbaum

259 P.2d 32, 119 Cal. App. 2d 12, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1169

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 3, 1953

DocketCiv. No. 15675

StatusPublished

This text of 259 P.2d 32 (Ronniger v. Birnbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronniger v. Birnbaum, 259 P.2d 32, 119 Cal. App. 2d 12, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1169 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

NOURSE, P. J.

The appeal is taken from a minute order interpreting a will, overruling objections to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser, and directing distribution of the residue of the estate—one-half to appellant and one-half to the respondent minors, share and share alike.

The testator left a legacy to each of his two daughters of $500. He made his second wife his residuary legatee without designation of a substitute. The wife predeceased him and her legacy accordingly lapsed. (Prob. Code, § 92.) Mrs. Birnbaum, one of decedent’s daughters, also predeceased him leaving two children, the respondents herein.

The only pertinent question raised by the appeal is whether the children of the deceased daughter take by right of representation one-half of the lapsed legacy—the other half going to the surviving daughter. The answer is found in the Probate Code. Section 92 provides: “If a devisee or legatee dies during the lifetime of the testator, the testamentary disposition to him fails, unless an intention appears to substitute another in his place. ’’ Section 222 provides: “.If the decedent leaves no surviving spouse, but leaves issue, the whole estate goes to such issue; and if all of the descendants are in the same degree of kindred to the decedent they share equally, otherwise they take by right of representation.”

Sufficient authority for the order under review is found in Estate of Heney, 66 Cal.App.2d 867, 869 [153 P.2d 427].

Order affirmed with costs taxed against appellant.

Booling J., and MeComb, J.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOURSE, P. J.

The appeal is taken from a minute order interpreting a will, overruling objections to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser, and directing distribution of the residue of the estate—one-half to appellant and one-half to the respondent minors, share and share alike.

The testator left a legacy to each of his two daughters of $500. He made his second wife his residuary legatee without designation of a substitute. The wife predeceased him and her legacy accordingly lapsed. (Prob. Code, § 92.) Mrs. Birnbaum, one of decedent’s daughters, also predeceased him leaving two children, the respondents herein.

The only pertinent question raised by the appeal is whether the children of the deceased daughter take by right of representation one-half of the lapsed legacy—the other half going to the surviving daughter. The answer is found in the Probate Code. Section 92 provides: “If a devisee or legatee dies during the lifetime of the testator, the testamentary disposition to him fails, unless an intention appears to substitute another in his place. ’’ Section 222 provides: “.If the decedent leaves no surviving spouse, but leaves issue, the whole estate goes to such issue; and if all of the descendants are in the same degree of kindred to the decedent they share equally, otherwise they take by right of representation.”

Sufficient authority for the order under review is found in Estate of Heney, 66 Cal.App.2d 867, 869 [153 P.2d 427].

Order affirmed with costs taxed against appellant.

Booling J., and MeComb, J.,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 P.2d 32, 119 Cal. App. 2d 12, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronniger-v-birnbaum-calctapp-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack