Ronnie Pace v. Chester B. Whatley and Alice Faye Whatley
Opinion
JfourtF) Court of is>an iUntomo,
October 3, 2013
No. 04-13-00136-CV
Ronnie Pace, Appellant
v.
Chester B. Whatley and Alice Faye Whatley, Appellees
Trial Court Case No. 10697B
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 6, 2013, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone, Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.
Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2013.
atherinp'Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and fixed the seal o/the said court on this October 3, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronnie Pace v. Chester B. Whatley and Alice Faye Whatley (Ronnie Pace v. Chester B. Whatley and Alice Faye Whatley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.