Ronnie McGee v. Robert Sturdivant

628 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2016·No. 14-60905·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Ronnie McGee, Mississippi prisoner # K4515, appeals the judgment entered in favor of the named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. However, his appellate brief fails to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8) as it is entirely devoid of any citations to documentary evidence or legal authority. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (stating that appellant’s failure to identify any error in lower court’s analysis *318 is the same as if he had not appealed); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993) (“Although we liberally construe the briefs of pro se appellants, we also require that arguments must be briefed to be preserved”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronnie McGee v. Robert Sturdivant, 628 F. App'x 317 (5th Cir. 2016).

628 F. App'x 317 (Ronnie McGee v. Robert Sturdivant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related