Ronnie Jackson v. Jeff Gutzmer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2019·No. 19-1706·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 19-1706

Ronnie Jackson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jeff Gutzmer, in his individual capacity; Natalie Liesman, in her individual capacity; Michelle Smith, in her individual capacity; Tammy Wherley, in her individual capacity; Tom Roy, in his official capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Submitted: November 7, 2019 Filed: November 13, 2019

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota prisoner Ronnie Jackson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing summary judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party; stating that summary judgment is appropriate if no genuine issue of material fact exists such that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronnie Jackson v. Jeff Gutzmer, (8th Cir. 2019).

Ronnie Jackson v. Jeff Gutzmer (Ronnie Jackson v. Jeff Gutzmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related