Ronnie Jackson, III v. Kathy Reid

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1376

___________________________

Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kathy Reid; Katherine Powers-Johnson, in their individual capacities;

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Tom Roy, in his official capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

Submitted: July 17, 2018

Filed: July 20, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Jackson, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, see Sisney v. Kaemingk, 886 F.3d 692, 697 (8th Cir. 2018), we agree with the district court that defendants Kathy Reid and Katherine Powers-Johnson were entitled to summary judgment.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2 The claims Jackson has abandoned have not been considered. See Hess v.

Ables, 714 F.3d 1048, 1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (abandonment of claims).