Ronnie Hoyt Royston II v. Craig Bundick & Harris County Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued March 10, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00672-CV ——————————— RONNIE HOYT ROYSTON II, Appellant V. CRAIG BUNDICK & HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-20831
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ronnie Hoyt Royston II has not timely filed a brief. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant
to file brief). We warned appellant that we would dismiss the appeal absent a
reasonable explanation for the failure to file a brief. See id. Appellant did not respond as we requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary
dismissal of case).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in accordance with Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) –(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronnie Hoyt Royston II v. Craig Bundick & Harris County Texas (Ronnie Hoyt Royston II v. Craig Bundick & Harris County Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.