Ronnie E. Johnson v. Floyd Emerson

110 F. App'x 740
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2004
Docket04-1636
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 F. App'x 740 (Ronnie E. Johnson v. Floyd Emerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronnie E. Johnson v. Floyd Emerson, 110 F. App'x 740 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie E. Johnson (Johnson) appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil complaint brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Gardner v. First Am. Title Ins. Co., 294 F.3d 991, 993 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude the dismissal was appropriate, and an extended discussion is not warranted. To the extent Johnson is appealing the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir.1998).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Emerson
544 U.S. 1023 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 F. App'x 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronnie-e-johnson-v-floyd-emerson-ca8-2004.