Ronnie Anderson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
This text of Ronnie Anderson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Ronnie Anderson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00326-CV
RONNIE ANDERSON, Appellant v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Appellee
From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 26514
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent to the majority’s dismissal of this appeal without affording
the appellant an opportunity to cure the Chapter 14 deficiency. See Ex parte N.C., ---
S.W.3d ---, --- n.1, 2015 WL 525150, at *3 n.1 (Tex. App.—Waco Jan. 22, 2015, no pet. h.)
(Davis, J., dissenting).
I believe that the correct practice is to notify the appellant of the section 14.004
deficiency and allow the appellant an opportunity to cure the deficiency before dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3; Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff's Office, 193 S.W.3d
898 (Tex. 2006); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997).
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Delivered and filed March 19, 2015
Anderson v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronnie Anderson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronnie-anderson-v-texas-department-of-criminal-jus-texapp-2015.