Roniotos v. Peerless Laundry Corporation

121 So. 530, 219 Ala. 157, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 121
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 4, 1929·No. 6 Div. 304.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The appeal in this case is from the judgment of the circuit court granting the defendant’s motion for a rehearing under what is generally known as the four months’ statute. Code of 1923, § 9521.

It is the settled rule of our decisions that this judgment will pot support an appeal. The insufficiency of the judgment to support dn appeal is jurisdictional, and the court will ex mero motu dismiss the appeal. Ingram, Probate Judge, v. Alabama Power Co., 201 Ala. 13, 75 So. 304; Ex parte North, 49 Ala. 385.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roniotos v. Peerless Laundry Corporation, 121 So. 530, 219 Ala. 157, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 121 (Ala. 1929).

121 So. 530 (Roniotos v. Peerless Laundry Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vacalis v. Lowry
184 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Riemers Company v. Northcutt
116 So. 2d 381 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)