Roney v. Tutt

39 S.E. 293, 113 Ga. 815, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 18, 1901·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. If a defendant’s property be sold under a void judgment and execution, and she, with legal notice of all the material facts, receive from the sheriff and retain a portion of the proceeds of the sale, this amounts in law to a ratification, and she is bound by the sale.

2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, the judge did not err in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roney v. Tutt, 39 S.E. 293, 113 Ga. 815, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 389 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 293 (Roney v. Tutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vitiaz v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
218 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Hardin v. KNOX CORPORATION
92 S.E.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Chapman v. Commercial National Bank
86 Ga. App. 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Alley v. Gormley
183 S.E. 787 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)