Roney v. Moss

Supreme Court of Alabama

Roney v. Moss

76 Ala. 491

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 15, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 76 Ala. 491 (Roney v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roney v. Moss, 76 Ala. 491 (Ala. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The certificate to the mortgage offered in evidence does not substantially conform to the requirements of the statute.' — Code of 1876, § 2158. A noteworthy omission in the certificate is, that it fails to aver the grantors were informed of the contents of the conveyance, not to notice other imperfections. — Code, § 2145. To justify the reception of the paper in evidence, there should have been other proof of its execution.' — Bickley v. Keenan, 60 Ala. 293; Hendon v. White, 52 Ala. 597; Sharpe v. Orme, 61 Ala. 263; Rogers v. Adams, 66 Ala. 600.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— The certificate to the mortgage offered in evidence does not substantially conform to the requirements of the statute.' — Code of 1876, § 2158. A noteworthy omission in the certificate is, that it fails to aver the grantors were informed of the contents of the conveyance, not to notice other imperfections. — Code, § 2145. To justify the reception of the paper in evidence, there should have been other proof of its execution.' — Bickley v. Keenan, 60 Ala. 293; Hendon v. White, 52 Ala. 597; Sharpe v. Orme, 61 Ala. 263; Rogers v. Adams, 66 Ala. 600.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Ala. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roney-v-moss-ala-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack