Roney v. Moss

76 Ala. 491
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The certificate to the mortgage offered in evidence does not substantially conform to the requirements of the statute.' — Code of 1876, § 2158. A noteworthy omission in the certificate is, that it fails to aver the grantors were informed of the contents of the conveyance, not to notice other imperfections. — Code, § 2145. To justify the reception of the paper in evidence, there should have been other proof of its execution.' — Bickley v. Keenan, 60 Ala. 293; Hendon v. White, 52 Ala. 597; Sharpe v. Orme, 61 Ala. 263; Rogers v. Adams, 66 Ala. 600.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roney v. Moss, 76 Ala. 491 (Ala. 1884).

76 Ala. 491 (Roney v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

UNITED STATES FINANCE COMPANY v. Jones
259 So. 2d 264 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Davidson v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.
109 Ala. 383 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Davis
91 Ala. 615 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Caldwell v. Pollak
91 Ala. 353 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Tranum v. Wilkinson
81 Ala. 408 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)