Roney Plaza Associates, Ltd. v. Henry

848 So. 2d 436, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9920, 2003 WL 21502498
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1677·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Roney Plaza Associates, Ltd. (“Roney”), appeals from the denial of its motion to vacate judgment and default. The record reflects that Roney demonstrated a meritorious defense to the action, established excusable neglect for its failure to respond to the complaint and notice of trial, and acted with due diligence in moving to set aside the default judgment. Thus it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to refuse to set aside the default, and we reverse the order denying Roney’s motion to vacate judgment and default. See North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Traveler, 699 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Electric Engineering Co., Inc. v. General Elec. Can., Inc., 610 So.2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roney Plaza Associates, Ltd. v. Henry, 848 So. 2d 436, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9920, 2003 WL 21502498 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

848 So. 2d 436 (Roney Plaza Associates, Ltd. v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Demars
848 So. 2d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)